NMP Professor Thio Li-Ann was giving a beautiful and engrossing speech about sodomy in Parliment on 23 October, in which she mentioned anal cancer, fecal waste, “bare-backing”, strong family values, “bully-boy tactics”, and “bug-chasing”. She mentioned how much her NUS students enjoy her lectures, which contain discussions on different aspects of gay sex, a topic always dear to the professor’s heart. After calling gays “obscene”, “vile”, “depraved”, “intellectually disingenous”, “moral deviants”, “hedonists” and pleaded that Singapore “not be subject to the tyranny of the undemocratic minority”, she wrapped up her speech with this statement: “Sir, let speaking in the public square with reason, passion, honesty, civility, even grace, be the mark of a Citizen of Singapore.” At this very moment, the LORD’s hand rained upon NMP Professor Thio Li-Ann brimstone and fire from the LORD out of heaven; and she looked back behind her, and she became a pillar of salt.
9 November 2007 at 10:49 pm
You guys can say what you want but we are proud of Prof Thio. She has succinctly spoken for the rest of us silent majority. One day the TRUTH will prevail and I am afraid many of you sympathisers will wish you had known the truth earlier!
10 November 2007 at 3:45 am
Mrs Ho, what is the truth you’re talking about? Be explicit, why hide behind meaningless rhetoric?
In my humble opinion the truth is that religion is rearing its ugly head in politics.
21 November 2007 at 3:26 am
Yes, Mrs. Ho, by her intolerant speech, Thio has revealed to the whole world that she is nothing more than a mouthpiece for the abhorrent ultra-fanatical Fundamentalist Christian Right-wing that threatens to usurp our secular government for its own fascistic ends. We have to thank Janadas Devan for eloquently and deftly exposing Thio for the fanatical religious right-winger that she really is, in a commentary he contributed recently to the Straits Times
28 November 2007 at 7:06 am
Well, let’s pray to Vaul that the majority remains silent. (Bonus points to anyone who gets the WH40K reference)
3 December 2007 at 3:54 am
I’m not against or for the 377A , however it is almost sad and depressing to hear a NMP speak like this using religion in multi ethnic society like this. She was blatantly a hate mongering and being vile at the same time. She should step down , she is setting a bad example for a country like singapore which prides itself in its level of professionalism and ethos. She obviously has none he arguements had no basis. Being a law student here in singapore any semi intelligent person can poke holes at her arguments. I hope someone reprimands her actions. Having said that , he “speech” has made me pro repealing 337a as i realise if i don’t take a stand i will be on the side of the hate mongering evil right wingers